Ecuador vs Panama: Closed and open shrubland … Burning annual growth rate

Ecuador
-100 % change on previous year
in 2018
Panama
-100 % change on previous year
in 2016
Ecuador rank
54th
Panama rank
54th

Closed and open shrubland … Burning annual growth rate over time

  • Ecuador
  • Panama
-1000100200300199120042018

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Panama, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Panama ahead.

Ecuador ranks 54th and Panama ranks 54th of 167 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Panama Difference Ahead
1990s 30.29 % change on previous year 27.04 % change on previous year 3.26 % change on previous year Ecuador
2000s -11.54 % change on previous year -63.1 % change on previous year 51.56 % change on previous year Ecuador
2010s -100 % change on previous year -100 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year —

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned), Ecuador or Panama?
Ecuador, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Panama as of 2018.
What is the difference in closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned) between Ecuador and Panama?
0 % change on previous year, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Panama?
13 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2010.
How do Ecuador and Panama rank globally for closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned)?
Ecuador ranks 54th and Panama ranks 54th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Panama: Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-and-open-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth/ecuador/panama/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-and-open-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth/ecuador/panama/">Ecuador vs Panama: Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
199 places, 4,236 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.