Eritrea vs Melanesia: Closed and open shrubland … Burning annual growth rate

Eritrea
-100 % change on previous year
in 2024
Melanesia
-100 % change on previous year
in 2023
Eritrea rank
54th
Melanesia rank
54th

Closed and open shrubland … Burning annual growth rate over time

  • Eritrea
  • Melanesia
-2000200400600800199120072024

How they compare

Eritrea currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Melanesia, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Melanesia ahead.

Eritrea ranks 54th and Melanesia ranks 54th of 167 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 1 and Melanesia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eritrea Melanesia Difference Ahead
1990s 48.4 % change on previous year 168.22 % change on previous year 119.83 % change on previous year Melanesia
2000s 15.43 % change on previous year 154.46 % change on previous year 139.03 % change on previous year Melanesia
2020s 27 % change on previous year -50.07 % change on previous year 77.07 % change on previous year Eritrea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned), Eritrea or Melanesia?
Eritrea, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Melanesia as of 2024.
What is the difference in closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned) between Eritrea and Melanesia?
0 % change on previous year, with Eritrea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Melanesia?
11 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2023.
How do Eritrea and Melanesia rank globally for closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned)?
Eritrea ranks 54th and Melanesia ranks 54th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eritrea vs Melanesia: Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-and-open-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth/eritrea/melanesia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-and-open-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth/eritrea/melanesia/">Eritrea vs Melanesia: Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
199 places, 4,236 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.