Eritrea vs Namibia: Closed and open shrubland … Burning annual growth rate

Eritrea
-100 % change on previous year
in 2024
Namibia
-87.39 % change on previous year
in 2024
Eritrea rank
54th
Namibia rank
52nd

Closed and open shrubland … Burning annual growth rate over time

  • Eritrea
  • Namibia
-1000100200300199120072024

How they compare

Namibia currently reports -87.39 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Eritrea, a difference of 12.61 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 20 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Namibia ahead.

Eritrea ranks 54th and Namibia ranks 52nd of 167 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 2 and Namibia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eritrea Namibia Difference Ahead
1990s 48.4 % change on previous year -12.11 % change on previous year 60.5 % change on previous year Eritrea
2000s 8.61 % change on previous year 70.68 % change on previous year 62.07 % change on previous year Namibia
2010s -99.43 % change on previous year -14.02 % change on previous year 85.41 % change on previous year Namibia
2020s -29.36 % change on previous year -35.79 % change on previous year 6.44 % change on previous year Eritrea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned), Eritrea or Namibia?
Namibia, at -87.39 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Eritrea as of 2024.
What is the difference in closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned) between Eritrea and Namibia?
12.61 % change on previous year, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Namibia?
20 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2024.
How do Eritrea and Namibia rank globally for closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned)?
Eritrea ranks 54th and Namibia ranks 52nd of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eritrea vs Namibia: Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-and-open-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth/eritrea/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-and-open-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth/eritrea/namibia/">Eritrea vs Namibia: Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
199 places, 4,236 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.