Fiji vs Namibia: Closed and open shrubland … Burning annual growth rate

Fiji
-100 % change on previous year
in 2000
Namibia
-87.39 % change on previous year
in 2024
Fiji rank
54th
Namibia rank
52nd

Closed and open shrubland … Burning annual growth rate over time

  • Fiji
  • Namibia
-1000100200300199120072024

How they compare

Namibia currently reports -87.39 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Fiji, a difference of 12.61 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Namibia ahead.

Fiji ranks 54th and Namibia ranks 52nd of 167 countries.

Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Fiji Namibia Difference Ahead
1990s -31.6 % change on previous year -10.28 % change on previous year 21.32 % change on previous year Namibia
2000s -100 % change on previous year 35.43 % change on previous year 135.43 % change on previous year Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned), Fiji or Namibia?
Namibia, at -87.39 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Fiji as of 2024.
What is the difference in closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned) between Fiji and Namibia?
12.61 % change on previous year, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Namibia?
9 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2000.
How do Fiji and Namibia rank globally for closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned)?
Fiji ranks 54th and Namibia ranks 52nd of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Fiji vs Namibia: Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-and-open-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth/fiji/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-and-open-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth/fiji/namibia/">Fiji vs Namibia: Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
199 places, 4,236 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.