Finland vs Mongolia: Closed and open shrubland … Burning annual growth rate

Finland
-100 % change on previous year
in 2022
Mongolia
-100 % change on previous year
in 2018
Finland rank
54th
Mongolia rank
54th

Closed and open shrubland … Burning annual growth rate over time

  • Finland
  • Mongolia
-2000200400600199120062022

How they compare

Finland currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Mongolia, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Mongolia ahead.

Finland ranks 54th and Mongolia ranks 54th of 167 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 1 and Mongolia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Finland Mongolia Difference Ahead
1990s 16.46 % change on previous year 62.06 % change on previous year 45.59 % change on previous year Mongolia
2000s -42.68 % change on previous year -13.68 % change on previous year 29 % change on previous year Mongolia
2010s -50.01 % change on previous year -72.14 % change on previous year 22.13 % change on previous year Finland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned), Finland or Mongolia?
Finland, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Mongolia as of 2022.
What is the difference in closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned) between Finland and Mongolia?
0 % change on previous year, with Finland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Mongolia?
13 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2016.
How do Finland and Mongolia rank globally for closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned)?
Finland ranks 54th and Mongolia ranks 54th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Finland vs Mongolia: Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-and-open-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth/finland/mongolia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-and-open-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth/finland/mongolia/">Finland vs Mongolia: Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
199 places, 4,236 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.