Greenland vs Libya: Closed and open shrubland … Burning annual growth rate
Greenland
-100 % change on previous year
in 2018
Libya
-100 % change on previous year
in 2021
Greenland rank
54th
Libya rank
54th
Closed and open shrubland … Burning annual growth rate over time
- Greenland
- Libya
How they compare
Greenland currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Libya, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Libya has been ahead every year.
Greenland ranks 54th and Libya ranks 54th of 167 countries.
Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned), Greenland or Libya?
- Greenland, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Libya as of 2018.
- What is the difference in closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned) between Greenland and Libya?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Greenland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Greenland and Libya?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 1996.
- How do Greenland and Libya rank globally for closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned)?
- Greenland ranks 54th and Libya ranks 54th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.