Guatemala vs Namibia: Closed and open shrubland … Burning annual growth rate

Guatemala
-100 % change on previous year
in 2018
Namibia
-87.39 % change on previous year
in 2024
Guatemala rank
54th
Namibia rank
52nd

Closed and open shrubland … Burning annual growth rate over time

  • Guatemala
  • Namibia
-2000200400199120072024

How they compare

Namibia currently reports -87.39 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Guatemala, a difference of 12.61 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 20 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Namibia ahead.

Guatemala ranks 54th and Namibia ranks 52nd of 167 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Namibia Difference Ahead
1990s 47 % change on previous year -8.07 % change on previous year 55.07 % change on previous year Guatemala
2000s -37.14 % change on previous year 22.26 % change on previous year 59.41 % change on previous year Namibia
2010s -50 % change on previous year -20.41 % change on previous year 29.59 % change on previous year Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned), Guatemala or Namibia?
Namibia, at -87.39 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Guatemala as of 2024.
What is the difference in closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned) between Guatemala and Namibia?
12.61 % change on previous year, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Namibia?
20 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2018.
How do Guatemala and Namibia rank globally for closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned)?
Guatemala ranks 54th and Namibia ranks 52nd of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Namibia: Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-and-open-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth/guatemala/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-and-open-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth/guatemala/namibia/">Guatemala vs Namibia: Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
199 places, 4,236 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.