Latvia vs Norway: Closed and open shrubland … Burning annual growth rate

Latvia
-100 % change on previous year
in 2001
Norway
-100 % change on previous year
in 2001
Latvia rank
54th
Norway rank
54th

Closed and open shrubland … Burning annual growth rate over time

  • Latvia
  • Norway
-1000100200199119962001

How they compare

Latvia currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Norway, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Norway ahead.

Latvia ranks 54th and Norway ranks 54th of 167 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Norway in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Norway Difference Ahead
1990s 35.69 % change on previous year -28.42 % change on previous year 64.11 % change on previous year Latvia
2000s -58.62 % change on previous year -51.21 % change on previous year 7.41 % change on previous year Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned), Latvia or Norway?
Latvia, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Norway as of 2001.
What is the difference in closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned) between Latvia and Norway?
0 % change on previous year, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Norway?
8 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2001.
How do Latvia and Norway rank globally for closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned)?
Latvia ranks 54th and Norway ranks 54th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Norway: Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-and-open-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth/latvia/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-and-open-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth/latvia/norway/">Latvia vs Norway: Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
199 places, 4,236 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.