Lithuania vs Sweden: Closed and open shrubland … Burning annual growth rate
Lithuania
-100 % change on previous year
in 2001
Sweden
-100 % change on previous year
in 1999
Lithuania rank
54th
Sweden rank
54th
Closed and open shrubland … Burning annual growth rate over time
- Lithuania
- Sweden
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Sweden, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Sweden ahead.
Lithuania ranks 54th and Sweden ranks 54th of 167 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned), Lithuania or Sweden?
- Lithuania, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Sweden as of 2001.
- What is the difference in closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned) between Lithuania and Sweden?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Sweden?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 1999.
- How do Lithuania and Sweden rank globally for closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned)?
- Lithuania ranks 54th and Sweden ranks 54th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.