Mauritania vs Zimbabwe: Closed and open shrubland … Burning annual growth rate

Mauritania
-50 % change on previous year
in 2024
Zimbabwe
-63.5 % change on previous year
in 2024
Mauritania rank
40th
Zimbabwe rank
42nd

Closed and open shrubland … Burning annual growth rate over time

  • Mauritania
  • Zimbabwe
-1000100200300400199120072024

How they compare

Mauritania currently reports -50 % change on previous year against -63.5 % change on previous year in Zimbabwe, a difference of 13.5 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Mauritania ranks 40th and Zimbabwe ranks 42nd of 167 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Mauritania averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritania Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 47.85 % change on previous year -8.92 % change on previous year 56.77 % change on previous year Mauritania
2000s 1.18 % change on previous year -12.16 % change on previous year 13.34 % change on previous year Mauritania
2010s -9.49 % change on previous year 14.58 % change on previous year 24.07 % change on previous year Zimbabwe
2020s 2.5 % change on previous year 41.47 % change on previous year 38.97 % change on previous year Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned), Mauritania or Zimbabwe?
Mauritania, at -50 % change on previous year against -63.5 % change on previous year in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
What is the difference in closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned) between Mauritania and Zimbabwe?
13.5 % change on previous year, with Mauritania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Zimbabwe?
29 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
How do Mauritania and Zimbabwe rank globally for closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned)?
Mauritania ranks 40th and Zimbabwe ranks 42nd of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritania vs Zimbabwe: Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-and-open-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth/mauritania/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-and-open-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth/mauritania/zimbabwe/">Mauritania vs Zimbabwe: Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
199 places, 4,236 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.