Myanmar vs Russian Federation: Closed and open shrubland … Burning annual growth rate

Myanmar
189.99 % change on previous year
in 2024
Russian Federation
236.57 % change on previous year
in 2024
Myanmar rank
10th
Russian Federation rank
7th

Closed and open shrubland … Burning annual growth rate over time

  • Myanmar
  • Russian Federation
02505007501.0k199120072024

How they compare

Russian Federation currently reports 236.57 % change on previous year against 189.99 % change on previous year in Myanmar, a difference of 46.58 % change on previous year.

That makes Russian Federation's figure about 1.2 times Myanmar's.

The two have swapped places 16 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Russian Federation ahead.

Myanmar ranks 10th and Russian Federation ranks 7th of 167 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Myanmar averaged higher in 1 and Russian Federation in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Myanmar Russian Federation Difference Ahead
1990s 45.03 % change on previous year 57.89 % change on previous year 12.86 % change on previous year Russian Federation
2000s 6.1 % change on previous year 72.79 % change on previous year 66.69 % change on previous year Russian Federation
2010s 21.35 % change on previous year 142.83 % change on previous year 121.47 % change on previous year Russian Federation
2020s 110.99 % change on previous year 79.12 % change on previous year 31.87 % change on previous year Myanmar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned), Myanmar or Russian Federation?
Russian Federation, at 236.57 % change on previous year against 189.99 % change on previous year in Myanmar as of 2024.
What is the difference in closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned) between Myanmar and Russian Federation?
46.58 % change on previous year, with Russian Federation ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and Russian Federation?
30 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.
How do Myanmar and Russian Federation rank globally for closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned)?
Myanmar ranks 10th and Russian Federation ranks 7th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Myanmar vs Russian Federation: Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-and-open-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth/myanmar/russian-federation-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-and-open-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth/myanmar/russian-federation-2/">Myanmar vs Russian Federation: Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
199 places, 4,236 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.