Namibia vs Rwanda: Closed and open shrubland … Burning annual growth rate

Namibia
-87.39 % change on previous year
in 2024
Rwanda
-100 % change on previous year
in 2017
Namibia rank
52nd
Rwanda rank
54th

Closed and open shrubland … Burning annual growth rate over time

  • Namibia
  • Rwanda
-1000100200300400199120072024

How they compare

Namibia currently reports -87.39 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Rwanda, a difference of 12.61 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 12 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Rwanda ahead.

Namibia ranks 52nd and Rwanda ranks 54th of 167 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Namibia averaged higher in 2 and Rwanda in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Namibia Rwanda Difference Ahead
1990s -8.07 % change on previous year 43.7 % change on previous year 51.77 % change on previous year Rwanda
2000s 104.72 % change on previous year -40.49 % change on previous year 145.21 % change on previous year Namibia
2010s -8.27 % change on previous year -100 % change on previous year 91.73 % change on previous year Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned), Namibia or Rwanda?
Namibia, at -87.39 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Rwanda as of 2024.
What is the difference in closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned) between Namibia and Rwanda?
12.61 % change on previous year, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Rwanda?
12 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2017.
How do Namibia and Rwanda rank globally for closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned)?
Namibia ranks 52nd and Rwanda ranks 54th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Namibia vs Rwanda: Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-and-open-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth/namibia/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-and-open-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth/namibia/rwanda/">Namibia vs Rwanda: Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
199 places, 4,236 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.