New Zealand vs Palestine: Closed and open shrubland … Burning annual growth rate

New Zealand
-100 % change on previous year
in 2001
Palestine
-100 % change on previous year
in 2021
New Zealand rank
54th
Palestine rank
54th

Closed and open shrubland … Burning annual growth rate over time

  • New Zealand
  • Palestine
-2000200400199120062021

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Palestine, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Palestine ahead.

New Zealand ranks 54th and Palestine ranks 54th of 167 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, New Zealand averaged higher in 1 and Palestine in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Zealand Palestine Difference Ahead
1990s 44.79 % change on previous year 51.82 % change on previous year 7.03 % change on previous year Palestine
2000s 47.29 % change on previous year -63.95 % change on previous year 111.24 % change on previous year New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned), New Zealand or Palestine?
New Zealand, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Palestine as of 2001.
What is the difference in closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned) between New Zealand and Palestine?
0 % change on previous year, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Palestine?
11 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2001.
How do New Zealand and Palestine rank globally for closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned)?
New Zealand ranks 54th and Palestine ranks 54th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Zealand vs Palestine: Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-and-open-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth/new-zealand/west-bank-and-gaza/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-and-open-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth/new-zealand/west-bank-and-gaza/">New Zealand vs Palestine: Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
199 places, 4,236 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.