Rwanda vs Sri Lanka: Closed and open shrubland … Burning annual growth rate

Rwanda
-100 % change on previous year
in 2017
Sri Lanka
-100 % change on previous year
in 2001
Rwanda rank
54th
Sri Lanka rank
54th

Closed and open shrubland … Burning annual growth rate over time

  • Rwanda
  • Sri Lanka
-2000200400199120042017

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Sri Lanka ahead.

Rwanda ranks 54th and Sri Lanka ranks 54th of 167 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 1 and Sri Lanka in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Rwanda Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1990s 43.7 % change on previous year 66.35 % change on previous year 22.65 % change on previous year Sri Lanka
2000s -40.49 % change on previous year -81.82 % change on previous year 41.33 % change on previous year Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned), Rwanda or Sri Lanka?
Rwanda, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Sri Lanka as of 2017.
What is the difference in closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned) between Rwanda and Sri Lanka?
0 % change on previous year, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Sri Lanka?
11 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2001.
How do Rwanda and Sri Lanka rank globally for closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned)?
Rwanda ranks 54th and Sri Lanka ranks 54th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rwanda vs Sri Lanka: Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-and-open-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth/rwanda/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-and-open-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth/rwanda/sri-lanka/">Rwanda vs Sri Lanka: Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
199 places, 4,236 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.