Sri Lanka vs Uruguay: Closed and open shrubland … Burning annual growth rate

Sri Lanka
-100 % change on previous year
in 2001
Uruguay
-100 % change on previous year
in 2023
Sri Lanka rank
54th
Uruguay rank
54th

Closed and open shrubland … Burning annual growth rate over time

  • Sri Lanka
  • Uruguay
-2000200400199120072023

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Uruguay, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Uruguay ahead.

Sri Lanka ranks 54th and Uruguay ranks 54th of 167 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Sri Lanka averaged higher in 1 and Uruguay in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sri Lanka Uruguay Difference Ahead
1990s 66.35 % change on previous year 36.83 % change on previous year 29.52 % change on previous year Sri Lanka
2000s -81.82 % change on previous year -18.36 % change on previous year 63.45 % change on previous year Uruguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned), Sri Lanka or Uruguay?
Sri Lanka, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Uruguay as of 2001.
What is the difference in closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned) between Sri Lanka and Uruguay?
0 % change on previous year, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Uruguay?
11 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2001.
How do Sri Lanka and Uruguay rank globally for closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned)?
Sri Lanka ranks 54th and Uruguay ranks 54th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sri Lanka vs Uruguay: Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-and-open-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth/sri-lanka/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-and-open-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth/sri-lanka/uruguay/">Sri Lanka vs Uruguay: Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
199 places, 4,236 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.