Sweden vs Tajikistan: Closed and open shrubland … Burning annual growth rate
Sweden
-100 % change on previous year
in 1999
Tajikistan
-100 % change on previous year
in 2022
Sweden rank
54th
Tajikistan rank
54th
Closed and open shrubland … Burning annual growth rate over time
- Sweden
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Sweden currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Tajikistan, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Tajikistan has been ahead every year.
Sweden ranks 54th and Tajikistan ranks 54th of 167 countries.
Tajikistan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned), Sweden or Tajikistan?
- Sweden, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Tajikistan as of 1999.
- What is the difference in closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned) between Sweden and Tajikistan?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sweden and Tajikistan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 1999.
- How do Sweden and Tajikistan rank globally for closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned)?
- Sweden ranks 54th and Tajikistan ranks 54th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.