What is the difference in closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned) between Sweden and United Republic of Tanzania?

0 % change on previous year, with Sweden ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Sweden and United Republic of Tanzania?

7 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 1999.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Sweden vs United Republic of Tanzania: Closed and open shrubland … Burning annual growth rate

Sweden

-100 % change on previous year

in 1999

United Republic of Tanzania

-100 % change on previous year

in 2024

Sweden rank

54th

United Republic of Tanzania rank

54th

Closed and open shrubland … Burning annual growth rate over time

Sweden
United Republic of Tanzania

How they compare

Sweden currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

Across all 7 years both countries report, United Republic of Tanzania has been ahead every year.

Sweden ranks 54th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 54th of 167 countries.

United Republic of Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned), Sweden or United Republic of Tanzania?: Sweden, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in United Republic of Tanzania as of 1999.
What is the difference in closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned) between Sweden and United Republic of Tanzania?: 0 % change on previous year, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sweden and United Republic of Tanzania?: 7 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 1999.
How do Sweden and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned)?: Sweden ranks 54th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 54th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sweden vs United Republic of Tanzania: Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-and-open-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth/sweden/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-and-open-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth/sweden/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Sweden vs United Republic of Tanzania: Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate
Unit: % change on previous year
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 199 places, 4,236 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed: 06 October 2026

The year-on-year percentage change in Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.