Australia and New Zealand vs Oceania: Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues

Australia and New Zealand
175.77 million t
in 2024
Oceania
175.77 million t
in 2024
Australia and New Zealand rank
2nd
Oceania rank
3rd

Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Oceania
0200.0M400.0M600.0M800.0M199020072024

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 175.77 million t against 175.77 million t in Oceania, a difference of 0 t.

Across all 35 years both countries report, Oceania has been ahead every year.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 2nd and Oceania ranks 3rd of 219 countries.

Oceania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Oceania Difference Ahead
1990s 297.22 million t 297.27 million t 53,800 t Oceania
2000s 345.68 million t 345.68 million t 4,600 t Oceania
2010s 320.18 million t 320.18 million t 1,200 t Oceania
2020s 225.79 million t 225.79 million t 200 t Oceania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues, Australia and New Zealand or Oceania?
Australia and New Zealand, at 175.77 million t against 175.77 million t in Oceania as of 2024.
What is the difference in closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues between Australia and New Zealand and Oceania?
0 t, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Oceania?
35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Oceania rank globally for closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 2nd and Oceania ranks 3rd of 219 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Oceania: Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-and-open-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/oceania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-and-open-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/oceania/">Australia and New Zealand vs Oceania: Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter)
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
271 places, 9,259 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.