Belarus vs Eritrea: Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues
Belarus
0 t
in 2024
Eritrea
0 t
in 2024
Belarus rank
56th
Eritrea rank
56th
Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues over time
- Belarus
- Eritrea
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Eritrea, a difference of 0 t.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Eritrea has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 56th and Eritrea ranks 56th of 219 countries.
Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Eritrea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2,865 t | 226,413 t | 223,548 t | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 142.99 t | 102,539 t | 102,396 t | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 0 t | 2,936 t | 2,936 t | Eritrea |
| 2020s | 0 t | 7,035 t | 7,035 t | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues, Belarus or Eritrea?
- Belarus, at 0 t against 0 t in Eritrea as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues between Belarus and Eritrea?
- 0 t, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Eritrea?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.
- How do Belarus and Eritrea rank globally for closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues?
- Belarus ranks 56th and Eritrea ranks 56th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.