Canada vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues

Canada
529,993 t
in 2024
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
14.55 million t
in 2024
Canada rank
11th
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
10th

Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues over time

  • Canada
  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
050.0M100.0M150.0M199020072024

How they compare

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 14.55 million t against 529,993 t in Canada, a difference of 14.02 million t.

That makes Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 27.4 times Canada's.

Across all 35 years both countries report, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has been ahead every year.

Canada ranks 11th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 10th of 219 countries.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Difference Ahead
1990s 4.30 million t 43.25 million t 38.94 million t Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2000s 477,167 t 33.14 million t 32.67 million t Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2010s 444,679 t 35.25 million t 34.80 million t Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2020s 1.06 million t 50.86 million t 49.80 million t Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues, Canada or Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 14.55 million t against 529,993 t in Canada as of 2024.
What is the difference in closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues between Canada and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
14.02 million t, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Canada and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank globally for closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues?
Canada ranks 11th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 10th of 219 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Canada vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-and-open-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/canada/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-and-open-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/canada/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/">Canada vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter)
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
271 places, 9,259 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.