Latvia vs Suriname: Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues
Latvia
0 t
in 2024
Suriname
0 t
in 2024
Latvia rank
56th
Suriname rank
56th
Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues over time
- Latvia
- Suriname
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Suriname, a difference of 0 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 56th and Suriname ranks 56th of 219 countries.
Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 471.51 t | 1,057 t | 585.04 t | Suriname |
| 2000s | 23.59 t | 43.01 t | 19.41 t | Suriname |
| 2010s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
| 2020s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues, Latvia or Suriname?
- Latvia, at 0 t against 0 t in Suriname as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues between Latvia and Suriname?
- 0 t, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Suriname?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Latvia and Suriname rank globally for closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues?
- Latvia ranks 56th and Suriname ranks 56th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.