Libya vs Rwanda: Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues
Libya
0 t
in 2024
Rwanda
0 t
in 2024
Libya rank
56th
Rwanda rank
56th
Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues over time
- Libya
- Rwanda
How they compare
Libya currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Rwanda, a difference of 0 t.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Libya ahead.
Libya ranks 56th and Rwanda ranks 56th of 219 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 3 and Rwanda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2,337 t | 839.94 t | 1,497 t | Libya |
| 2000s | 92.03 t | 193.07 t | 101.04 t | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 2,055 t | 30.56 t | 2,025 t | Libya |
| 2020s | 1,104 t | 0 t | 1,104 t | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues, Libya or Rwanda?
- Libya, at 0 t against 0 t in Rwanda as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues between Libya and Rwanda?
- 0 t, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Rwanda?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Libya and Rwanda rank globally for closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues?
- Libya ranks 56th and Rwanda ranks 56th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.