Northern America vs Zimbabwe: Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues

Northern America
1.88 million t
in 2024
Zimbabwe
260,380 t
in 2024
Northern America rank
15th
Zimbabwe rank
17th

Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues over time

  • Northern America
  • Zimbabwe
05.0M10.0M15.0M20.0M25.0M199020072024

How they compare

Northern America currently reports 1.88 million t against 260,380 t in Zimbabwe, a difference of 1.62 million t.

That makes Northern America's figure about 7.2 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Northern America ahead.

Northern America ranks 15th and Zimbabwe ranks 17th of 31 groups.

Across the 4 decades both report, Northern America averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Northern America Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 8.88 million t 1.85 million t 7.04 million t Northern America
2000s 4.51 million t 5.11 million t 602,205 t Zimbabwe
2010s 2.45 million t 2.08 million t 368,170 t Northern America
2020s 3.24 million t 430,374 t 2.81 million t Northern America

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues, Northern America or Zimbabwe?
Northern America, at 1.88 million t against 260,380 t in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
What is the difference in closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues between Northern America and Zimbabwe?
1.62 million t, with Northern America ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Northern America and Zimbabwe?
35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Northern America and Zimbabwe rank globally for closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues?
Northern America ranks 15th and Zimbabwe ranks 17th of 31 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Northern America vs Zimbabwe: Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-and-open-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/northern-america/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-and-open-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/northern-america/zimbabwe/">Northern America vs Zimbabwe: Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter)
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
271 places, 9,259 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.