China vs Iceland: Closed and open shrubland: Burning crop … Burning square kilometre

China
0 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland
0 t per square kilometre
in 2023
China rank
56th
Iceland rank
56th

Closed and open shrubland: Burning crop … Burning square kilometre over time

  • China
  • Iceland
00.050.10.15199020062023

How they compare

China currently reports 0 t per square kilometre against 0 t per square kilometre in Iceland, a difference of 0 t per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was China ahead.

China ranks 56th and Iceland ranks 56th of 186 countries.

China has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Iceland Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0382 t per square kilometre 0.002 t per square kilometre 0.0363 t per square kilometre China
2000s 0.0135 t per square kilometre 0.0004 t per square kilometre 0.0131 t per square kilometre China
2010s 0.0013 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre 0.0013 t per square kilometre China
2020s 0.0001 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre 0.0001 t per square kilometre China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned), China or Iceland?
China, at 0 t per square kilometre against 0 t per square kilometre in Iceland as of 2023.
What is the difference in closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned) between China and Iceland?
0 t per square kilometre, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Iceland?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do China and Iceland rank globally for closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned)?
China ranks 56th and Iceland ranks 56th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Iceland: Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-and-open-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-square/china/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-and-open-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-square/china/iceland/">China vs Iceland: Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
187 places, 6,213 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.