Ecuador vs Jordan: Closed and open shrubland: Burning crop … Burning square kilometre

Ecuador
0 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Jordan
0 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
56th
Jordan rank
56th

Closed and open shrubland: Burning crop … Burning square kilometre over time

  • Ecuador
  • Jordan
00.020.040.06199020062023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 0 t per square kilometre against 0 t per square kilometre in Jordan, a difference of 0 t per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 56th and Jordan ranks 56th of 186 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 3 and Jordan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Jordan Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0169 t per square kilometre 0.0049 t per square kilometre 0.0121 t per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 0.0088 t per square kilometre 0.0008 t per square kilometre 0.008 t per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 0.0007 t per square kilometre 0.0003 t per square kilometre 0.0003 t per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 0 t per square kilometre 0.0026 t per square kilometre 0.0026 t per square kilometre Jordan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned), Ecuador or Jordan?
Ecuador, at 0 t per square kilometre against 0 t per square kilometre in Jordan as of 2023.
What is the difference in closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned) between Ecuador and Jordan?
0 t per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Jordan?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Jordan rank globally for closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned)?
Ecuador ranks 56th and Jordan ranks 56th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Jordan: Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-and-open-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-square/ecuador/jordan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-and-open-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-square/ecuador/jordan/">Ecuador vs Jordan: Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
187 places, 6,213 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.