Kazakhstan vs Norway: Closed and open shrubland: Burning crop … Burning square kilometre

Kazakhstan
0 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Norway
0 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Kazakhstan rank
56th
Norway rank
56th

Closed and open shrubland: Burning crop … Burning square kilometre over time

  • Kazakhstan
  • Norway
00.511.5199020062023

How they compare

Kazakhstan currently reports 0 t per square kilometre against 0 t per square kilometre in Norway, a difference of 0 t per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.

Kazakhstan ranks 56th and Norway ranks 56th of 186 countries.

Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kazakhstan Norway Difference Ahead
1990s 0.6039 t per square kilometre 0.0357 t per square kilometre 0.5683 t per square kilometre Kazakhstan
2000s 0.0672 t per square kilometre 0.0002 t per square kilometre 0.067 t per square kilometre Kazakhstan
2010s 0.0007 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre 0.0007 t per square kilometre Kazakhstan
2020s 0.0001 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre 0.0001 t per square kilometre Kazakhstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned), Kazakhstan or Norway?
Kazakhstan, at 0 t per square kilometre against 0 t per square kilometre in Norway as of 2023.
What is the difference in closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned) between Kazakhstan and Norway?
0 t per square kilometre, with Kazakhstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Norway?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Kazakhstan and Norway rank globally for closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned)?
Kazakhstan ranks 56th and Norway ranks 56th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kazakhstan vs Norway: Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-and-open-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-square/kazakhstan/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-and-open-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-square/kazakhstan/norway/">Kazakhstan vs Norway: Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
187 places, 6,213 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.