Namibia vs Zimbabwe: Closed and open shrubland: Burning crop … Burning square kilometre

Namibia
10 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
1.84 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia rank
4th
Zimbabwe rank
6th

Closed and open shrubland: Burning crop … Burning square kilometre over time

  • Namibia
  • Zimbabwe
020406080199020062023

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 10 t per square kilometre against 1.84 t per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 8.16 t per square kilometre.

That makes Namibia's figure about 5.4 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Namibia ahead.

Namibia ranks 4th and Zimbabwe ranks 6th of 186 countries.

Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Namibia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 11.66 t per square kilometre 4.78 t per square kilometre 6.89 t per square kilometre Namibia
2000s 16.53 t per square kilometre 13.21 t per square kilometre 3.32 t per square kilometre Namibia
2010s 22.2 t per square kilometre 5.38 t per square kilometre 16.83 t per square kilometre Namibia
2020s 18.96 t per square kilometre 1.22 t per square kilometre 17.74 t per square kilometre Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned), Namibia or Zimbabwe?
Namibia, at 10 t per square kilometre against 1.84 t per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned) between Namibia and Zimbabwe?
8.16 t per square kilometre, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Zimbabwe?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Namibia and Zimbabwe rank globally for closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned)?
Namibia ranks 4th and Zimbabwe ranks 6th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Namibia vs Zimbabwe: Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-and-open-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-square/namibia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-and-open-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-square/namibia/zimbabwe/">Namibia vs Zimbabwe: Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
187 places, 6,213 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.