South Africa vs Zimbabwe: Closed and open shrubland: Burning crop … Burning square kilometre

South Africa
12.95 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
1.84 t per square kilometre
in 2023
South Africa rank
3rd
Zimbabwe rank
6th

Closed and open shrubland: Burning crop … Burning square kilometre over time

  • South Africa
  • Zimbabwe
0510152025199020062023

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 12.95 t per square kilometre against 1.84 t per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 11.11 t per square kilometre.

That makes South Africa's figure about 7.0 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

South Africa ranks 3rd and Zimbabwe ranks 6th of 186 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, South Africa averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Africa Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 7.24 t per square kilometre 4.78 t per square kilometre 2.47 t per square kilometre South Africa
2000s 4.47 t per square kilometre 13.21 t per square kilometre 8.73 t per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 4.23 t per square kilometre 5.38 t per square kilometre 1.15 t per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 9.15 t per square kilometre 1.22 t per square kilometre 7.93 t per square kilometre South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned), South Africa or Zimbabwe?
South Africa, at 12.95 t per square kilometre against 1.84 t per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned) between South Africa and Zimbabwe?
11.11 t per square kilometre, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Zimbabwe?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do South Africa and Zimbabwe rank globally for closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned)?
South Africa ranks 3rd and Zimbabwe ranks 6th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Africa vs Zimbabwe: Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-and-open-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-square/south-africa/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-and-open-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-square/south-africa/zimbabwe/">South Africa vs Zimbabwe: Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
187 places, 6,213 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.