Canada vs Congo: Closed and open shrubland: Burning crop residues … unit GDP Burning

Canada
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Congo
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Canada rank
26th
Congo rank
29th

Closed and open shrubland: Burning crop residues … unit GDP Burning over time

  • Canada
  • Congo
0000199020072024

How they compare

Canada currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Congo, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.

That makes Canada's figure about 1.6 times Congo's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Congo ahead.

Canada ranks 26th and Congo ranks 29th of 183 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Canada averaged higher in 1 and Congo in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada Congo Difference Ahead
1990s 0 t per US$ of GDP 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP Congo
2000s 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP Congo
2010s 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP Congo
2020s 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP Canada

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned), Canada or Congo?
Canada, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Congo as of 2024.
What is the difference in closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned) between Canada and Congo?
0 t per US$ of GDP, with Canada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Congo?
35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Canada and Congo rank globally for closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned)?
Canada ranks 26th and Congo ranks 29th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Canada vs Congo: Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-and-open-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-unit-of-gdp/canada/congo-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-and-open-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-unit-of-gdp/canada/congo-rep/">Canada vs Congo: Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per unit of GDP
Unit
t per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
184 places, 6,187 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.