Eritrea vs Zimbabwe: Closed and open shrubland: Burning crop residues … unit GDP Burning

Eritrea
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2011
Zimbabwe
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Eritrea rank
10th
Zimbabwe rank
9th

Closed and open shrubland: Burning crop residues … unit GDP Burning over time

  • Eritrea
  • Zimbabwe
00.0010.0010.002199020072024

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Eritrea, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.2 times Eritrea's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 19 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Eritrea ranks 10th and Zimbabwe ranks 9th of 183 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eritrea Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0003 t per US$ of GDP 0.0002 t per US$ of GDP 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP Eritrea
2000s 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP 0.0009 t per US$ of GDP 0.0007 t per US$ of GDP Zimbabwe
2010s 0 t per US$ of GDP 0.0004 t per US$ of GDP 0.0004 t per US$ of GDP Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned), Eritrea or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Eritrea as of 2024.
What is the difference in closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned) between Eritrea and Zimbabwe?
0 t per US$ of GDP, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Zimbabwe?
19 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2011.
How do Eritrea and Zimbabwe rank globally for closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned)?
Eritrea ranks 10th and Zimbabwe ranks 9th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eritrea vs Zimbabwe: Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-and-open-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-unit-of-gdp/eritrea/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-and-open-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-unit-of-gdp/eritrea/zimbabwe/">Eritrea vs Zimbabwe: Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per unit of GDP
Unit
t per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
184 places, 6,187 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.