Mali vs Zimbabwe: Closed and open shrubland: Burning crop residues … unit GDP Burning

Mali
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Zimbabwe
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Mali rank
12th
Zimbabwe rank
9th

Closed and open shrubland: Burning crop residues … unit GDP Burning over time

  • Mali
  • Zimbabwe
00.0010.0020.0030.004199020072024

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Mali, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.5 times Mali's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Mali ahead.

Mali ranks 12th and Zimbabwe ranks 9th of 183 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Mali averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mali Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0014 t per US$ of GDP 0.0003 t per US$ of GDP 0.0011 t per US$ of GDP Mali
2000s 0.0004 t per US$ of GDP 0.0009 t per US$ of GDP 0.0004 t per US$ of GDP Zimbabwe
2010s 0 t per US$ of GDP 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP Zimbabwe
2020s 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned), Mali or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Mali as of 2024.
What is the difference in closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned) between Mali and Zimbabwe?
0 t per US$ of GDP, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Zimbabwe?
35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Mali and Zimbabwe rank globally for closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned)?
Mali ranks 12th and Zimbabwe ranks 9th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mali vs Zimbabwe: Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-and-open-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-unit-of-gdp/mali/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-and-open-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-unit-of-gdp/mali/zimbabwe/">Mali vs Zimbabwe: Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per unit of GDP
Unit
t per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
184 places, 6,187 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.