Cuba vs Guatemala: Closed shrubland — Burned Area, annual growth rate
Cuba
-100 % change on previous year
in 2021
Guatemala
-100 % change on previous year
in 2008
Cuba rank
29th
Guatemala rank
29th
Closed shrubland — Burned Area, annual growth rate over time
- Cuba
- Guatemala
How they compare
Cuba currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Guatemala, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 12 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Guatemala ahead.
Cuba ranks 29th and Guatemala ranks 29th of 159 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Guatemala | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 99.35 % change on previous year | 80.63 % change on previous year | 18.73 % change on previous year | Cuba |
| 2000s | -1.74 % change on previous year | -57.82 % change on previous year | 56.09 % change on previous year | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burned area, annual growth rate, Cuba or Guatemala?
- Cuba, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Guatemala as of 2021.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burned area, annual growth rate between Cuba and Guatemala?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Guatemala?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2002.
- How do Cuba and Guatemala rank globally for closed shrubland — burned area, annual growth rate?
- Cuba ranks 29th and Guatemala ranks 29th of 159 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Closed shrubland — Burned Area, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Closed shrubland — Burned Area. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.