Denmark vs Japan: Closed shrubland — Burned Area, annual growth rate
Denmark
-100 % change on previous year
in 2001
Japan
-100 % change on previous year
in 2013
Denmark rank
29th
Japan rank
29th
Closed shrubland — Burned Area, annual growth rate over time
- Denmark
- Japan
How they compare
Denmark currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Japan, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Japan ahead.
Denmark ranks 29th and Japan ranks 29th of 159 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Denmark averaged higher in 1 and Japan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Denmark | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.0495 % change on previous year | 62.57 % change on previous year | 62.62 % change on previous year | Japan |
| 2000s | -50 % change on previous year | -52.17 % change on previous year | 2.17 % change on previous year | Denmark |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burned area, annual growth rate, Denmark or Japan?
- Denmark, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Japan as of 2001.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burned area, annual growth rate between Denmark and Japan?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Denmark ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Japan?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2001.
- How do Denmark and Japan rank globally for closed shrubland — burned area, annual growth rate?
- Denmark ranks 29th and Japan ranks 29th of 159 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Closed shrubland — Burned Area, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Closed shrubland — Burned Area. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.