Eswatini vs Togo: Closed shrubland — Burned Area, annual growth rate
Eswatini
-100 % change on previous year
in 2020
Togo
-100 % change on previous year
in 2001
Eswatini rank
29th
Togo rank
29th
Closed shrubland — Burned Area, annual growth rate over time
- Eswatini
- Togo
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Togo, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Togo ahead.
Eswatini ranks 29th and Togo ranks 29th of 159 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 1 and Togo in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Togo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 20.33 % change on previous year | 45.52 % change on previous year | 25.19 % change on previous year | Togo |
| 2000s | 163.13 % change on previous year | -92.39 % change on previous year | 255.52 % change on previous year | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burned area, annual growth rate, Eswatini or Togo?
- Eswatini, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Togo as of 2020.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burned area, annual growth rate between Eswatini and Togo?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Togo?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2001.
- How do Eswatini and Togo rank globally for closed shrubland — burned area, annual growth rate?
- Eswatini ranks 29th and Togo ranks 29th of 159 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Closed shrubland — Burned Area, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Closed shrubland — Burned Area. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.