Finland vs Malawi: Closed shrubland — Burned Area, annual growth rate
Finland
-100 % change on previous year
in 2001
Malawi
-100 % change on previous year
in 2021
Finland rank
29th
Malawi rank
29th
Closed shrubland — Burned Area, annual growth rate over time
- Finland
- Malawi
How they compare
Finland currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Malawi, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Malawi ahead.
Finland ranks 29th and Malawi ranks 29th of 159 countries.
Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 8.72 % change on previous year | 50.4 % change on previous year | 41.68 % change on previous year | Malawi |
| 2000s | -51.28 % change on previous year | 74.14 % change on previous year | 125.42 % change on previous year | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burned area, annual growth rate, Finland or Malawi?
- Finland, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Malawi as of 2001.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burned area, annual growth rate between Finland and Malawi?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Malawi?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2001.
- How do Finland and Malawi rank globally for closed shrubland — burned area, annual growth rate?
- Finland ranks 29th and Malawi ranks 29th of 159 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Closed shrubland — Burned Area, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Closed shrubland — Burned Area. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.