Libya vs Netherlands (Kingdom of the): Closed shrubland — Burned Area, annual growth rate
Libya
-100 % change on previous year
in 2000
Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
-100 % change on previous year
in 2001
Libya rank
29th
Netherlands (Kingdom of the) rank
29th
Closed shrubland — Burned Area, annual growth rate over time
- Libya
- Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
How they compare
Libya currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Netherlands (Kingdom of the), a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 9 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ahead.
Libya ranks 29th and Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ranks 29th of 159 countries.
Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burned area, annual growth rate, Libya or Netherlands (Kingdom of the)?
- Libya, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Netherlands (Kingdom of the) as of 2000.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burned area, annual growth rate between Libya and Netherlands (Kingdom of the)?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Netherlands (Kingdom of the)?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 1999.
- How do Libya and Netherlands (Kingdom of the) rank globally for closed shrubland — burned area, annual growth rate?
- Libya ranks 29th and Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ranks 29th of 159 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Closed shrubland — Burned Area, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Closed shrubland — Burned Area. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.