Libya vs Uzbekistan: Closed shrubland — Burned Area, annual growth rate
Libya
-100 % change on previous year
in 2000
Uzbekistan
-100 % change on previous year
in 2001
Libya rank
29th
Uzbekistan rank
29th
Closed shrubland — Burned Area, annual growth rate over time
- Libya
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Libya currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 8 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Uzbekistan ahead.
Libya ranks 29th and Uzbekistan ranks 29th of 159 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 1 and Uzbekistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 83.8 % change on previous year | -0.0845 % change on previous year | 83.88 % change on previous year | Libya |
| 2000s | -100 % change on previous year | 44.07 % change on previous year | 144.07 % change on previous year | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burned area, annual growth rate, Libya or Uzbekistan?
- Libya, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Uzbekistan as of 2000.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burned area, annual growth rate between Libya and Uzbekistan?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Uzbekistan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2000.
- How do Libya and Uzbekistan rank globally for closed shrubland — burned area, annual growth rate?
- Libya ranks 29th and Uzbekistan ranks 29th of 159 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Closed shrubland — Burned Area, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Closed shrubland — Burned Area. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.