Malawi vs Norway: Closed shrubland — Burned Area, annual growth rate
Malawi
-100 % change on previous year
in 2021
Norway
-100 % change on previous year
in 2001
Malawi rank
29th
Norway rank
29th
Closed shrubland — Burned Area, annual growth rate over time
- Malawi
- Norway
How they compare
Malawi currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Norway, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Norway ahead.
Malawi ranks 29th and Norway ranks 29th of 159 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Malawi averaged higher in 1 and Norway in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 50.4 % change on previous year | 65.34 % change on previous year | 14.94 % change on previous year | Norway |
| 2000s | 74.14 % change on previous year | -50 % change on previous year | 124.14 % change on previous year | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burned area, annual growth rate, Malawi or Norway?
- Malawi, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Norway as of 2021.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burned area, annual growth rate between Malawi and Norway?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Norway?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2001.
- How do Malawi and Norway rank globally for closed shrubland — burned area, annual growth rate?
- Malawi ranks 29th and Norway ranks 29th of 159 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Closed shrubland — Burned Area, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Closed shrubland — Burned Area. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.