Nepal vs Rwanda: Closed shrubland — Burned Area, annual growth rate
Nepal
-100 % change on previous year
in 2010
Rwanda
-100 % change on previous year
in 2001
Nepal rank
29th
Rwanda rank
29th
Closed shrubland — Burned Area, annual growth rate over time
- Nepal
- Rwanda
How they compare
Nepal currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Rwanda, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Rwanda ahead.
Nepal ranks 29th and Rwanda ranks 29th of 159 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Nepal averaged higher in 1 and Rwanda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nepal | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 74.6 % change on previous year | 45.44 % change on previous year | 29.16 % change on previous year | Nepal |
| 2000s | -96.96 % change on previous year | -40.49 % change on previous year | 56.47 % change on previous year | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burned area, annual growth rate, Nepal or Rwanda?
- Nepal, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Rwanda as of 2010.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burned area, annual growth rate between Nepal and Rwanda?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Rwanda?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2001.
- How do Nepal and Rwanda rank globally for closed shrubland — burned area, annual growth rate?
- Nepal ranks 29th and Rwanda ranks 29th of 159 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Closed shrubland — Burned Area, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Closed shrubland — Burned Area. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.