Afghanistan vs Burkina Faso: Closed shrubland — Burned Area
Afghanistan
0 ha
in 2024
Burkina Faso
0 ha
in 2024
Afghanistan rank
34th
Burkina Faso rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Burned Area over time
- Afghanistan
- Burkina Faso
How they compare
Afghanistan currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Burkina Faso, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Burkina Faso ahead.
Afghanistan ranks 34th and Burkina Faso ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Burkina Faso has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Burkina Faso | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 299.53 ha | 13,803 ha | 13,504 ha | Burkina Faso |
| 2000s | 47.52 ha | 2,919 ha | 2,871 ha | Burkina Faso |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burned area, Afghanistan or Burkina Faso?
- Afghanistan, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Burkina Faso as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burned area between Afghanistan and Burkina Faso?
- 0 ha, with Afghanistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Burkina Faso?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Afghanistan and Burkina Faso rank globally for closed shrubland — burned area?
- Afghanistan ranks 34th and Burkina Faso ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.