Armenia vs Suriname: Closed shrubland — Burned Area
Armenia
0 ha
in 2024
Suriname
0 ha
in 2024
Armenia rank
34th
Suriname rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Burned Area over time
- Armenia
- Suriname
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Suriname, a difference of 0 ha.
Across all 33 years both countries report, Suriname has been ahead every year.
Armenia ranks 34th and Suriname ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 9.44 ha | 39.57 ha | 30.13 ha | Suriname |
| 2000s | 0.1596 ha | 1.61 ha | 1.45 ha | Suriname |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burned area, Armenia or Suriname?
- Armenia, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Suriname as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burned area between Armenia and Suriname?
- 0 ha, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Suriname?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Armenia and Suriname rank globally for closed shrubland — burned area?
- Armenia ranks 34th and Suriname ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.