Australia and New Zealand vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Closed shrubland — Burned Area

Australia and New Zealand
307,633 ha
in 2024
Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
284,880 ha
in 2024
Australia and New Zealand rank
2nd
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank
1st

Closed shrubland — Burned Area over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
01.0M2.0M3.0M199020072024

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 307,633 ha against 284,880 ha in Least Developed Countries (LDCs), a difference of 22,753 ha.

That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Least Developed Countries (LDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 2nd and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 1st of 219 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 3 and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Least Developed Countries (LDCs) Difference Ahead
1990s 761,812 ha 790,742 ha 28,930 ha Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
2000s 1.44 million ha 602,939 ha 838,882 ha Australia and New Zealand
2010s 1.11 million ha 298,452 ha 814,417 ha Australia and New Zealand
2020s 657,405 ha 233,934 ha 423,471 ha Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher closed shrubland — burned area, Australia and New Zealand or Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
Australia and New Zealand, at 307,633 ha against 284,880 ha in Least Developed Countries (LDCs) as of 2024.
What is the difference in closed shrubland — burned area between Australia and New Zealand and Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
22,753 ha, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank globally for closed shrubland — burned area?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 2nd and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 1st of 219 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Closed shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-shrubland-burned-area-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/least-developed-countries-ldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-shrubland-burned-area-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/least-developed-countries-ldcs/">Australia and New Zealand vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Closed shrubland — Burned Area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Closed shrubland — Burned Area
Unit
ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
271 places, 9,259 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.