Australia and New Zealand vs Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs): Closed shrubland — Burned Area
Closed shrubland — Burned Area over time
- Australia and New Zealand
- Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
How they compare
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) currently reports 318,904 ha against 307,633 ha in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 11,271 ha.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.
Australia and New Zealand ranks 2nd and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ranks 5th of 219 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 3 and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia and New Zealand | Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 761,812 ha | 957,190 ha | 195,378 ha | Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) |
| 2000s | 1.44 million ha | 777,864 ha | 663,957 ha | Australia and New Zealand |
| 2010s | 1.11 million ha | 607,510 ha | 505,360 ha | Australia and New Zealand |
| 2020s | 657,405 ha | 442,225 ha | 215,180 ha | Australia and New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burned area, Australia and New Zealand or Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)?
- Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs), at 318,904 ha against 307,633 ha in Australia and New Zealand as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burned area between Australia and New Zealand and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)?
- 11,271 ha, with Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Australia and New Zealand and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) rank globally for closed shrubland — burned area?
- Australia and New Zealand ranks 2nd and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ranks 5th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.