Australia vs Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs): Closed shrubland — Burned Area

Australia
307,633 ha
in 2024
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
318,904 ha
in 2024
Australia rank
2nd
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) rank
5th

Closed shrubland — Burned Area over time

  • Australia
  • Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
01.0M2.0M3.0M199020072024

How they compare

Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) currently reports 318,904 ha against 307,633 ha in Australia, a difference of 11,271 ha.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 2nd and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ranks 5th of 219 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 3 and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) Difference Ahead
1990s 761,793 ha 957,190 ha 195,397 ha Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
2000s 1.44 million ha 777,864 ha 663,948 ha Australia
2010s 1.11 million ha 607,510 ha 505,360 ha Australia
2020s 657,405 ha 442,225 ha 215,180 ha Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher closed shrubland — burned area, Australia or Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)?
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs), at 318,904 ha against 307,633 ha in Australia as of 2024.
What is the difference in closed shrubland — burned area between Australia and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)?
11,271 ha, with Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)?
35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Australia and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) rank globally for closed shrubland — burned area?
Australia ranks 2nd and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ranks 5th of 219 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs): Closed shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-shrubland-burned-area-fao-tier-1/australia/net-food-importing-developing-countries-nfidcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-shrubland-burned-area-fao-tier-1/australia/net-food-importing-developing-countries-nfidcs/">Australia vs Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs): Closed shrubland — Burned Area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Closed shrubland — Burned Area
Unit
ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
271 places, 9,259 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.