Bahamas vs Cuba: Closed shrubland — Burned Area
Bahamas
0 ha
in 2024
Cuba
0 ha
in 2024
Bahamas rank
34th
Cuba rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Burned Area over time
- Bahamas
- Cuba
How they compare
Bahamas currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Cuba, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Cuba ahead.
Bahamas ranks 34th and Cuba ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Bahamas averaged higher in 1 and Cuba in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahamas | Cuba | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 225.49 ha | 304.53 ha | 79.04 ha | Cuba |
| 2000s | 60.5 ha | 89.14 ha | 28.63 ha | Cuba |
| 2010s | 10.71 ha | 4.28 ha | 6.43 ha | Bahamas |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 4.28 ha | 4.28 ha | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burned area, Bahamas or Cuba?
- Bahamas, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Cuba as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burned area between Bahamas and Cuba?
- 0 ha, with Bahamas ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Cuba?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Bahamas and Cuba rank globally for closed shrubland — burned area?
- Bahamas ranks 34th and Cuba ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.