Bangladesh vs Latvia: Closed shrubland — Burned Area
Bangladesh
0 ha
in 2024
Latvia
0 ha
in 2024
Bangladesh rank
34th
Latvia rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Burned Area over time
- Bangladesh
- Latvia
How they compare
Bangladesh currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Latvia, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Bangladesh ahead.
Bangladesh ranks 34th and Latvia ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 21.25 ha | 9.43 ha | 11.82 ha | Bangladesh |
| 2000s | 0 ha | 0.8837 ha | 0.8837 ha | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burned area, Bangladesh or Latvia?
- Bangladesh, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burned area between Bangladesh and Latvia?
- 0 ha, with Bangladesh ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Latvia?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Bangladesh and Latvia rank globally for closed shrubland — burned area?
- Bangladesh ranks 34th and Latvia ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.