Belarus vs China, Hong Kong SAR: Closed shrubland — Burned Area
Belarus
0 ha
in 2024
China, Hong Kong SAR
0 ha
in 2024
Belarus rank
34th
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Burned Area over time
- Belarus
- China, Hong Kong SAR
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in China, Hong Kong SAR, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 34th and China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | China, Hong Kong SAR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 87.71 ha | 22.55 ha | 65.17 ha | Belarus |
| 2000s | 4.97 ha | 0.1596 ha | 4.81 ha | Belarus |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burned area, Belarus or China, Hong Kong SAR?
- Belarus, at 0 ha against 0 ha in China, Hong Kong SAR as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burned area between Belarus and China, Hong Kong SAR?
- 0 ha, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and China, Hong Kong SAR?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Belarus and China, Hong Kong SAR rank globally for closed shrubland — burned area?
- Belarus ranks 34th and China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.