Belarus vs Ecuador: Closed shrubland — Burned Area
Belarus
0 ha
in 2024
Ecuador
21.37 ha
in 2024
Belarus rank
34th
Ecuador rank
33rd
Closed shrubland — Burned Area over time
- Belarus
- Ecuador
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 21.37 ha against 0 ha in Belarus, a difference of 21.37 ha.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 34th and Ecuador ranks 33rd of 219 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 87.71 ha | 134.45 ha | 46.74 ha | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 4.97 ha | 77.77 ha | 72.8 ha | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 6.41 ha | 6.41 ha | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 4.27 ha | 4.27 ha | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burned area, Belarus or Ecuador?
- Ecuador, at 21.37 ha against 0 ha in Belarus as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burned area between Belarus and Ecuador?
- 21.37 ha, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Ecuador?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Belarus and Ecuador rank globally for closed shrubland — burned area?
- Belarus ranks 34th and Ecuador ranks 33rd of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.