Belarus vs Malawi: Closed shrubland — Burned Area
Belarus
0 ha
in 2024
Malawi
21.39 ha
in 2024
Belarus rank
34th
Malawi rank
31st
Closed shrubland — Burned Area over time
- Belarus
- Malawi
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 21.39 ha against 0 ha in Belarus, a difference of 21.39 ha.
Across all 33 years both countries report, Malawi has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 34th and Malawi ranks 31st of 219 countries.
Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 87.71 ha | 1,251 ha | 1,163 ha | Malawi |
| 2000s | 4.97 ha | 468.78 ha | 463.81 ha | Malawi |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 42.77 ha | 42.77 ha | Malawi |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 8.55 ha | 8.55 ha | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burned area, Belarus or Malawi?
- Malawi, at 21.39 ha against 0 ha in Belarus as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burned area between Belarus and Malawi?
- 21.39 ha, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Malawi?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Belarus and Malawi rank globally for closed shrubland — burned area?
- Belarus ranks 34th and Malawi ranks 31st of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.