Belarus vs Uganda: Closed shrubland — Burned Area
Belarus
0 ha
in 2024
Uganda
0 ha
in 2024
Belarus rank
34th
Uganda rank
34th
Closed shrubland — Burned Area over time
- Belarus
- Uganda
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Uganda, a difference of 0 ha.
Across all 33 years both countries report, Uganda has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 34th and Uganda ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 87.71 ha | 18,146 ha | 18,058 ha | Uganda |
| 2000s | 4.97 ha | 1,081 ha | 1,076 ha | Uganda |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 21.37 ha | 21.37 ha | Uganda |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 8.55 ha | 8.55 ha | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — burned area, Belarus or Uganda?
- Belarus, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Uganda as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — burned area between Belarus and Uganda?
- 0 ha, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Uganda?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Belarus and Uganda rank globally for closed shrubland — burned area?
- Belarus ranks 34th and Uganda ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.